everythingpossible - Fotolia
The new HHS healthcare technology top official's plans are still unknown, but signs point to possible changes to ONC that could weaken the agency's regulatory authority.
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
After President Donald Trump installed John Fleming, a former Republican congressman of Louisiana, in the newly created post of Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) deputy assistant secretary for health technology reform, Fleming told Politico he thought he had been interviewing for the top Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) job.
Not so, it turned out. But the new HHS healthcare technology chief -- a longtime associate of Tom Price, the current HHS secretary and a fellow physician and former GOP congressman -- nonetheless also mentioned to the Washington, D.C., website that ONC "may be reorganizing."
Few in the capitol, other than his fans, want to comment publicly about what Fleming's ascension to the top HHS healthcare technology post could mean for ONC.
And Fleming, who served four terms in the House before losing in a Republican primary for Senate in Louisiana last year, has remained publicly silent since he took the HHS healthcare job on March 21.
But in Fleming's congressional record, there are more than a few clues as to what could transpire. And there are some other circumstantial signals.
Does ONC face downsizing?
Perhaps the biggest puzzle: Since there has never been an HHS post with Fleming's title, the development presumably could mean that ONC would not get a national coordinator at all, and the whole agency would just be folded more tightly into HHS.
The top ONC position, after remaining vacant for more than two months, has been filled with the apparent appointment of Donald Rucker, M.D., former Siemens chief medical officer.
In the worst-case scenario for people who like ONC, the already smallish agency could be downsized. A cautionary footnote to that view is ONC was created by a Republican president, George W. Bush.
Along with administering the technology end of federal healthcare reimbursement programs, ONC promotes interoperability; patient access to health data; and newer technologies and approaches, such as open APIs, blockchain and telemedicine.
Of course, if ONC is trimmed back, that would please conservative health IT constituencies and groups such as Health IT Now.
Health IT Now released a fairly glowing statement on Fleming's appointment. The biggest health IT organization, the Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, also praised Fleming and called him an advocate for technology in healthcare, while decreasing unnecessary burdens on providers.
A week earlier, Health IT Now wrote a detailed letter to Price calling on HHS to review the role of ONC, asserting that ONC has overstepped its regulatory authority.
Health IT Now was specifically referring to ONC's health IT certification program, in which vendors submit their software for testing by ONC-contracted labs to see if it meets interoperability, usability and other measures to qualify their systems to be used for Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement.
Vendors have long complained about the program. Trump campaigned as antiregulatory. Fleming, although he has said he is pro-technology and EHRs, could well trim, or even eliminate, the certification process as being overly regulatory.
ONC budget seems to remain solid
All that said, the outlook for ONC may be less dire than some pro-ONC people fear.
For one, the agency's $60 million line item in the federal budget remained untouched in Trump's budget proposal for 2018. Indeed, the budget doesn't even mention ONC, so that could be good or bad for the agency.
Also, the landmark 21st Century Cures Act of 2015 specifically lays out health IT provisions that are now the purview of ONC, including encouraging interoperability and preventing information blocking.
That could prove contentious in Congress, where issues like value-based care and interoperability have had broad bipartisan support.
Meanwhile, in Congress, Fleming, a family medicine doctor and addiction specialist, did a stint as co-chairman of the GOP "Doc Caucus," which could be seen as the legislative voice of the beleaguered solo doctor frustrated by EHRs and government reporting mandates.
Fleming supported a proposal to delay meaningful use stage 3, and in his capacity as a Doc Caucus leader, he criticized MACRA as too complex and its reporting requirements too burdensome on doctors.
Fleming also co-sponsored several bills to repeal the Affordable Care Act.
Stay tuned for how he and Price will define the government's role in health IT.
Amid change of administrations, ONC active at HIMSS
MACRA could be tough to handle for small physician practices
ONC determines interoperability measures for MACRA