Analyst assesses how blockchain in healthcare will affect storage

Blockchain is getting a lot of attention of late and healthcare is not exempt from this emerging technology. Even the government is trying to assess the role of blockchain in healthcare.

Download this free guide

Download Complete Guide to Healthcare IoT Now

Healthcare IoT has the potential to greatly improve patient care – but it’s not without its challenges. Download this essential guide in one PDF and learn how to overcome the obstacles: security, data overload, regulations, and more.

Start Download

• Corporate E-mail Address:

  You forgot to provide an Email Address.

  This email address doesn’t appear to be valid.

  This email address is already registered. Please login.

  You have exceeded the maximum character limit.

  Please provide a Corporate E-mail Address.

• • I agree to TechTarget’s Terms of Use, Privacy Policy, and the transfer of my information to the United States for processing to provide me with relevant information as described in our Privacy Policy.

  Please check the box if you want to proceed.

• • I agree to my information being processed by TechTarget and its Partners to contact me via phone, email, or other means regarding information relevant to my professional interests. I may unsubscribe at any time.

  Please check the box if you want to proceed.

By submitting my Email address I confirm that I have read and accepted the Terms of Use and Declaration of Consent.

But with all this talk of the possibilities of blockchain in healthcare, it's also important to understand how it will affect other health IT systems. Martha Bennett, principal analyst serving CIOs at Forrester Research, based in Cambridge, Mass., discusses how blockchain in healthcare will affect storage and gives an example of how storage is being used in conjunction with blockchain.

How will blockchain affect storage in healthcare?

Martha Bennett

Martha Bennett: I would say that health records tend to involve quite large files like image files, you know, X-rays and scans and that sort of thing. They are not really a suitable data type to go onto a sort of standard blockchain simply because if a blockchain is replicated -- that being one of the basic principles, that it's a shared, replicated, distributed system -- then those files are simply too large to replicate around the place. So you would probably have off-chain storage and a hash of the record being stored on-chain. So you can control the access to it and very importantly also see whether anybody has made an attempt to tamper with the record.

You mentioned off-chain storage. Does that mean healthcare organizations would have to buy more storage? Or can they continue to use whatever storage platform they're already using?

Bennett: The detail would depend on precisely what they wish to put in place but it could be their existing storage. For example, the Estonian government ... all of the health records in Estonia are actually secured via blockchain. ... Those records themselves sit in an Oracle database and the blockchain solution is integrated with that Oracle database -- but obviously that is a very specific solution.

Do you think blockchain in healthcare will affect any other IT systems? Let me know; reach out on Twitter at @Kristen_Lee_34 or shoot me an email at klee@techtarget.com.