August 19, 2014 12:26 PM
Posted by: adelvecchio
Black Hat 2014
, healthcare security
, Medical devices
Guest post by Mac McMillan, CEO of CynergisTek, Inc.
I’ve recently read several blogs and other pieces in the press proffering the theme that the healthcare industry somehow dodged a bullet at this year’s hacker conferences. If you believe that then you don’t really understand the healthcare IT landscape.
I agree there did not seem to be much focus on medical device security compared to years past, when the hacks of implanted cardiac defibrillators and insulin pumps helped raise the visibility of patient safety. Still, there wasn’t much presented at Black Hat 2014 that won’t be an issue for healthcare. I would have liked for the folks at Black Hat to have kept pressure on medical device security because it is one issue that both providers and consumers need to be resolved.
Healthcare is an industry that is absolutely reliant on its systems and networks. Nearly all processes in hospitals today are automated or supported by some form of technology. More than 95% of patient information is digitized, and just like businesses in many other industries, healthcare providers’ operations hinge on complex interdependencies with supply chain vendors that rely on the Internet, software as a service, hosted services, cloud solutions and more. So, if you understand healthcare, you know that almost everything that went on at Black Hat applies to healthcare in some way. Let’s look at some of the highlights.
Researchers at this year’s Black Hat conference exposed weaknesses in Google Glass that could allow a hacker to capture passwords. Last time I checked we have physicians walking around some of our hospitals testing these newfangled spectacles to learn how they can be used to support care delivery. These glasses can capture patient information directly, presenting privacy and security challenges. Understanding any security issues associated with these devices is absolutely relevant to healthcare. As with any new device, we must fully explore how it can assist or improve the doctor-patient experience. We must also be sure to make any new technology safe to use by evaluating both its capabilities and associated risks.
Another session presented a new method of anonymously performing screen scraping of information with virtual desktop infrastructure (VDI) technology. Not relevant to healthcare? Think again. Many healthcare entities are turning to virtual solutions to reduce the risk of compromising patient information. Many have completed or are in the process of VDI implementations. So threats to VDI are absolutely relevant to healthcare. We are going to see more and more virtualization in the healthcare space as entities identify the risk of desktops. Again, understanding these risks is important and Black Hat provided — if nothing else — a reminder that any technology is exploitable. Presentations at the event also showed that hackers are still out there, and it’s important to be aware of their presence. VDI is no exception.
I can go on and on, and talk about the sessions that discussed compromising active directories through Kerberos, USB controller chip flaws, free cloud botnets, mobile device management solution weaknesses, or a host of other topics. But why bother, no one in healthcare uses these technologies. We’re still using cans and strings. This reminds me of a conversation I had with a CISO at a hospital this past week that highlighted how narrow some peoples’ vision is with respect to security issues. It dealt with medical device security and the fears that some healthcare professionals have — worries that most outside of the IT department totally miss.
As I said earlier, the headlines are always about devices and their potential for harming patients, because that’s what gets people’s attention. The real problem is with insecure medical devices; those running a version of Windows XP susceptible to a zero-day hack for instance, deployed by the hundreds in hospitals networks today — the same networks that also hold EHR, radiology, laboratory and financial systems, etc. All of those would be at risk if a hacker were to work their way onto their network and launch an attack. This would harm the whole network and possibly put the hospital through the embarrassment of being used to hack others. Finally, it would inadvertently affect the patients connected to or relying on the hospitals’ devices.
So were the sessions presented at Black Hat this year relevant to healthcare? You bet they were, even if not directly relevant in some cases. Indirectly, they were a reminder that diligence in maintaining awareness and keeping up with what’s going on in the security world is important to understanding risk.
August 5, 2014 11:50 AM
Posted by: adelvecchio
, cloud ehr
, data exchange
Guest post by Zach Watson, content writer, TechnologyAdvice
Where providers once questioned the security of the cloud and its compliance with HIPAA standards, they’re now accepting the relief it provides by allowing vendors to handle the majority of the security infrastructure for data and applications. In 2011, around 41 % of healthcare providers were using cloud computing in their practice or facility, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Only a year later, MarketsandMarkets predicted that cloud computing would grow at a 20% rate in healthcare until 2017.
As a result of subsiding security concerns, cloud adoption has risen among electronic health record vendors as well. Vendors who offer providers an EHR platform deployed exclusively in the cloud have realized significant growth, as evidenced by Practice Fusion’s, Inc.’s rise to the top five in market share, and athenahealth Inc. penetrating the top 10.
As cloud-based EHRs become more prominent, it behooves providers to consider whether the cloud’s improved accessibility will ease interoperability between different EHR systems. Since many providers are attesting to stage 2 of the meaningful use program, interoperability should be top of mind. In order to qualify for these federal incentives, providers have to be able to share clinical data across “geographical, organizational, or vendor boundaries.”
The vendor boundary poses the greatest challenge. Many first-generation EHRs were deployed in a client/server model, which basically works in a closed network, where a server located in a physician’s office fulfills client requests on one network. Additionally, many of these on-premise EHRs store clinical information in disparate formats, making it difficult to transport data, though not impossible.
The disparate data formats employed by these systems has made it difficult to implement a standard for data transportation. The CMS admits that stage 2 interoperability includes data in many formats and exchange standards. Data standards are fundamental to interoperability, because providers exchanging data must have an understanding about the way clinical information will be structured in order to make sending and receiving an intuitive process.
Semantic differences and proprietary data storage have led to the rise of Health Level 7 (HL7), a text-based standard that client/server systems can use to communicate. It has been around since 1987 and works well with the majority of modern information infrastructure. However, clinical data must be converted into HL7, which still needs to happen at the organizational level, undermining the simplicity of the exchange.
It shouldn’t come as a surprise that the sharing of clinical summaries, i.e., text-based data, is more common among providers than the sharing of lab results. Even at the vendor level, HL7 adoption is not ubiquitous, which affects the transfer of data and software architecture.
Until recently, the EHR market was inundated with client/server systems; will the uptick in cloud-based adoption have a positive effect on interoperability?
Ostensibly, the answer should be yes. Cloud computing came to the fore in the business world as a method to store, share, and access data — making data democratization simpler than previous client/server deployments. However, cloud-based EHRs are still subject to the same data standards as on-premise systems. Sure, access and permissions can be granted more easily, but cloud-based systems would still use HL7 and other standards to exchange data, just like client/server models.
In fact, interoperability among different cloud computing applications remains a viable concern in industries outside of healthcare, albeit in a different manner. Outside of healthcare, businesses are more worried about vendor lock-in, or not being able to transfer their data from one cloud provider to another should they choose to switch. In healthcare, data transfer holds a greater implication: improving the quality of care delivered to patients through improved coordination among providers.
Certain cloud-based applications such as patient portals can provide patients with greater access to their healthcare records, though patient portals still necessitate oversight on the part of the patient. Effective interoperability would entail the automatic transfer of necessary information to the doctor a patient is referred to.
While interoperability can be achieved, it’s still mostly occurring on same-vendor systems. Certain cloud EHRs have made great strides in improving interoperability, but that is more often the result of focused collaboration between two entities rather than widespread acceptance of particular standards.
Other industries such as telecommunications, cable, and banking agreed upon a standard method for exchanging data because they saw a competitive benefit to doing so. Meaningful use stage 2 requirements attempt to create a competitive benefit by requiring clients of EHR vendors to share data across systems. Cloud-based EHRs may have an advantage because their systems are theoretically constructed with interoperability in mind, though they are still subject to the obstacles of exchange standards.
As it stands now, interoperability is slowly becoming more common. A cloud-based system alone is not enough to facilitate intuitive data transfer, though cloud vendors may be more capable of helping providers construct a plan for reaching that goal.
About the author:
Zach Watson is a content writer at TechnologyAdvice. He covers healthcare IT, business intelligence, and gamification. Connect with him on Google+.
July 17, 2014 11:22 AM
Posted by: adelvecchio
Coding and documentation
, ICD-10 delay
, ICD-10 migration planning
, ICD-10 transition
Guest post by Minnette Terlep, vice president of business development and chief compliance officer, Amphion Medical Solutions
The one-year delay in the transition to ICD-10 is considered by some healthcare professionals to be a significant setback in the progress healthcare systems had made toward implementing the expanded code set. The ICD-10 delay will likely create a financial burden for those that heeded vows from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) that there would be no further delays. Many existing preparations were rendered largely useless because of the “use or lose it” nature of the skills so carefully honed in ICD-10 training programs.
However, setting industry-wide disappointment aside, there are actually a number of ways in which healthcare organizations can use the delay to their advantage. For example, they can make use of the extra time to put together a detailed plan that will mitigate the anticipated effects on productivity and the data fog that will hover during the first few months after ICD-10 becomes the law of the land. The delay also allows providers that were behind schedule a chance to conduct critical gap analyses.
Perhaps the best way to make the most of the extra year is to conceptualize strategies to counter the delay’s effect on the coder shortage, which many industry experts place at 30% nationwide. The delay will likely worsen the problem because, in preparation for the expected 2014 transition date, most new coders were trained exclusively on ICD-10 codes — skills that don’t easily apply to ICD-9.
And it will get worse before it gets better.
The aging workforce has bumped the average age of today’s coder up to 58 and the largest segment of the Baby Boomer generation is rapidly approaching retirement age. Many older coders have indicated they will retire or choose other employment rather than invest time and effort into learning the new ICD-10 code set.
Hospitals can leverage the ICD-10 delay by identifying ways to mitigate the impact the shortage has on their ability to keep up with current and future coding needs. The American Health Information Management Association recommends a multi-faceted approach that combines some or all of the following steps to create a customized program.
- Retraining outpatient coders in ICD-9: Hiring quality inpatient coders is a far more difficult task than hiring their outpatient counterparts. Thus, hospitals have identified retraining their outpatient coders as a worthwhile investment.
- Transitioning transcriptionists to ICD-9 coders: Transcriptionists can readily be cross-trained as coders because of their familiarity with patient records and clinical terminology. This creates a valuable resource that can be tapped to manage fluctuations in volume and planned or unplanned staff shortages — particularly as demand for transcription service declines in the wake of speech recognition technology implementations.
- Retraining new graduates: Most new graduates are coming out of coder training programs ready to operate in an ICD-10 environment. The problem, for at least the next year, is that organizations are still coding under ICD-9. Incorporating ICD-9 training programs into recruitment efforts gives these new graduates the short-term skills they need until they can apply their ICD-10 knowledge and makes them more experienced for when ICD-10 is implemented.
- Outsourcing: Finding qualified coders can be a daunting task. Hospitals have to use good business sense to determine if recruitment and training is where they want to put their energy and resources. For this reason, outsourcing is an appealing option for many facilities that don’t have access to a pool of qualified coders.
While each hospital has different needs, they all share a common challenge: finding enough coders to support current ICD-9 and future ICD-10 needs. Healthcare organizations that take advantage of the extra time created by the ICD-10 deferment and implement strategies to minimize the impact the ongoing coder shortage has on their facilities will benefit in the long run.
Minnette Terlep, B.S., RHIT, is vice president of business development and chief compliance officer for Amphion Medical Solutions. She can be reached at Minnette.Terlep@amphionmedical.com.
July 9, 2014 1:55 PM
Posted by: adelvecchio
Accountable Care Organizations
, HIPAA privacy rule
Guest post by Rebekah Johnson, senior compliance manager, West Corporation
Technology has become so woven into the fabric of our society that it often overshadows face-to-face communication. It’s so prevalent in healthcare that patients have come to expect their doctors to use technology to communicate with them between office visits, hence the rise of patient engagement technologies. In 2012, a Medical Group Management Association study reported that approximately 44% of healthcare practices were using notifications technology to automate appointment reminders. Today, mHealth is the fastest growing area in the health IT space. However, along with mass adoption of healthcare technology comes the necessary evil of compliance — which can be a crippling force that works against patient engagement.
When there are more pages of regulations for Medicare than in the Internal Revenue Service code, it’s no wonder healthcare professionals are struggling to keep up with regulations. Add HIPAA and its steep requirements for protecting sensitive patient data, and you’ve got a big case of compliance overload in the healthcare industry.
The compliance challenge makes it difficult for healthcare providers to maximize the technology investments they’ve made. There are thousands of healthcare providers that have automated appointment reminder systems in place. Most want to use that same technology platform to engage patients between doctor visits to drive improved health outcomes. When it comes to patient engagement, these same healthcare providers stop at simple appointment reminders because they don’t know what types of patient communications fall within the limits of HIPAA regulations.
The good news is, healthcare providers have a fairly open field when it comes to patient engagement technologies — they just need to understand the rules. For simplicity, compliance dos and don’ts should be considered in relation to messages that reach and engage patients and lead to better health outcomes.
Keep in touch with patients to reduce missed appointments
Today, it’s quite common for healthcare providers to reach out to patients with communications that remind them to make and keep appointments, or pay their bills. In fact, this strategy has resulted in a more than 30% reduction in missed appointments, industry-wide. It’s also been proven to reduce past-due accounts and increase monthly collections and by more than 25%.
When this type of message is generic in content, privacy and security considerations are not a concern, and the patient communications can be delivered via interactive voice response, text, email or mobile applications.
The most common compliance culprit for these messages is including information about the purpose of the appointment, such as, “This message is to remind you of your appointment for a biopsy of your left breast on Friday, November 2, at 3:00 PM.” These messages are fine when it comes to engaging patients. However, when patient details are included, it’s important the message be delivered using a secure mobile application with features that protect the privacy of the patient. Alternatively, the healthcare provider can simply remove the test details. Patients are open to receiving this type of communication via SMS or email — in fact, that’s often exactly the type of communication they prefer to receive from their healthcare provider. In that instance, it’s simply a matter of getting the patient’s permission and documenting her preferences so you can communicate in this fashion while remaining compliant.
Engaging patients to increase accountability
While payers and providers are usually in the spotlight when it comes to accountable care, the most successful models will be the ones that place a strong focus on patient accountability, said Kevin Pho, M.D. “All patients across the care continuum need to be participants in their own care, and providers should be implementing strategies to encourage this accountability both at the point of care and, more importantly, once the patient goes home,” he wrote.
To achieve success, healthcare professionals need to go beyond reminding patients to keep appointments and pay their bills. Healthcare providers must communicate with patients between visits and offer information that will help them understand the state of their health, their personal role in becoming healthier, and hope that will help patients stick with treatment plans between appointments. This is precisely the level of support Americans are asking for from their healthcare providers.
The TeleVox Healthy World report titled, “Technology Beyond the Exam Room,” found that 85% of United States healthcare consumers feel that high-tech engagement, from sources such as email, text messages and voicemails, is as helpful, if not more helpful, than in-person or phone conversations with their healthcare provider. More than 35% of patients who don’t follow exact treatment plans say that they would be more likely to follow directions if they received reminders from their doctors via email, voicemail or text.
Moving from simple appointment reminders to engaging patients at this level is where healthcare providers begin to feel crippled by compliance. Fortunately, when taking patient engagement up a notch, a little knowledge goes a long way toward remaining compliant. In the case of HIPAA regulations, the most important thing for healthcare providers to remember is that the same rules apply regardless of whether the communication is a text message reminding the patient of an upcoming appointment or an email intended to educate the patient about his health and encourage him to follow his treatment plan.
Healthcare providers don’t need to worry about non-compliance of HIPAA privacy and security when communications contain generic information. However, messages that reveal past or present health conditions can cause compliance concerns. The workaround is being diligent about capturing, documenting and using patient engagement preferences and permissions. With diligence comes a policy that enables compliance officers, in many cases nurses, to quickly and easily approve and deliver patient engagement communications based on the patient’s unique preferences and permissions. A policy should provide communications guidelines that include clear examples of messages or pre-approved scripts by the healthcare professional. It also should include examples of messages that may require a closer compliance review prior to delivery.
It’s also a good idea to have a formal procedure for capturing and documenting patient engagement preferences. It could be as simple as having the patient complete an electronic questionnaire on a tablet while waiting to be greeted by the doctor. This intake form should ask patients to share their preferences for receiving various types of communications. The way patients prefer to receive communications from their provider will likely change based on the information being delivered. For example, patients often want their doctors to email educational tips or information that will help them live a more healthy life, but they may prefer to receive a phone call to remind them about an upcoming appointment.
[Activating positive patient behaviors requires providers not only understand what information their patients require to stay on track, but how their patients want that communication to be delivered --- via voice, automated messages, text or email.]
Activating improved health outcomes
With the industry’s movement toward accountable care, it’s no longer enough to prescribe a treatment plan. It’s increasingly important for healthcare providers to focus on encouraging patients to follow treatment plans. This requires ongoing reminders and alerts to take medication, check blood sugars, eat right, and exercise. In fact, research shows patients welcome activation emails, text messages and voicemails from their healthcare providers that tell them to do something specific, such as take medication, schedule a routine medical screening, or get a flu shot. Almost half of American adults are currently treating a disease or chronic illness, such as a heart problem, diabetes or cancer. That’s more than 100 million opportunities for healthcare providers to deliver communications that drive patients to follow their treatment plans.
In the near future, two-way communication between patients and providers will be the norm. So, overcome the compliance challenge today by putting the power of preference in the hands of the patient.
This article is intended to provide general information about the subject matter covered. It is not intended to provide legal advice, opinions, or serve as a substitute for counsel by licensed legal professionals.
About the author: Rebekah Johnson, CIPP/US, is a senior compliance manager for West Corporation. In this role, she develops and maintains compliance operations concerning the privacy and security of client information, including personally identifiable information, PHI, sensitive and financial data. Rebekah’s experience also includes managing West Notification, Inc.’s U.S.-European Union Safe Harbor certification.
 “2012 Performances and Practices of Successful Medical Groups,” Medical Group Management Association, 2012.
 “Implementing Strategies to Encourage Patient Accountability”, www.kevinmd.com/blog, January 2012.
 “Technology Beyond the Exam Room: How Digital Media is Helping Doctors Deliver the Highest Level of Care, TeleVox Software, December 2012.
 “Chronic Diseases: The Leading Causes of Death and Disability in the United States,” Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2012.
June 18, 2014 1:53 PM
Posted by: adelvecchio
, Data storage
, Health care analytics
Guest post by Roberta Katz, director, healthcare solutions, EMC Corporation, @Roberta_Katz, @EMCHealthcare
The online data we produce will grow 40% per year into the next decade, according to IDC’s new report, “The Digital Universe of Opportunities: Rich Data and the Increasing Value of the Internet of Things.” For healthcare organizations, this data will expand the number of opportunities to include smarter medical devices and innovative sensors to track and manage critical health indicators in real time. Caregivers can employ advanced analytics on the data coming from these devices to help reduce inpatient complications and avoidable readmissions, deliver personalized medicine, identify genetic markers, improve clinical trial safety, and more.
This increase in data places more responsibility on organizations to strengthen their IT department by leveraging the latest technologies and advancements for the security, privacy, and continuous availability of protected health information, (PHI) with a particular focus on patient identification and the reliability of information being collected.
The digital universe — what’s to come
Imagine for a minute the sheer volume of the world’s digital data in 2014, cited in the Digital Universe report — which could fill a stack of iPad Air tablets extending two-thirds of the distance to the moon. By 2020, this stack would extend from the earth to the moon 6.6 times, meaning that the digital universe is doubling every two years. In 2013, the digital universe contained 4.4 trillion gigabytes, and by 2020, that figure will grow to 10 times that number — to 44 trillion gigabytes. For healthcare organizations, the real question is not what to do with this data, but how to make use of it to accelerate clinical effectiveness and time to treatment.
- Data growth is largely due to the explosion of the Internet of Things, thanks to wearable technology and machine to machine applications that may help improve clinical workflows and outcomes. The use of health tracking devices for disease prevention and management is an emerging trend. There are new tools that remotely monitor patient physiological measures, aging in place, and smart pills that report proper adherence with medications. Analyst firm IDC estimates that the number of computerized things is approaching a staggering 200 billion, with 7% of all computerized objects wired and communicating on the Internet.
- To leap ahead, organizations are adopting cloud, IT as a Service, and software defined technologies. These next generation IT models offer new ways to improve caregiver collaboration and interactions with patients.
- The percentage of “target rich” data is expected to more than double by 2020, compared to the 5% available in 2013, as organizations take advantage of new big data analytics technologies. IDC defines target rich data as data that is accessible, available in real time, and can be properly analyzed and acted upon.
- For healthcare organizations, this means leveraging automated tools to aggregate, manage, and analyze useful data from across the healthcare ecosystem to gain patient care insights.
Is big data the cure?
A recent MeriTalk study, “The Big Data Cure,” reveals the impact of growing data sets on the healthcare industry and its ability to improve drug trial safety, disease surveillance, prescribed treatments, and overall patient outcomes. Emerging technologies including mHealth and machine to machine will be driving forces behind this change. However, to reap these benefits, healthcare organizations must take the first steps now, so the technology can deliver real returns later.
To ensure preparedness, healthcare organizations should:
Plan: Embrace an enterprise-wide trusted IT approach that integrates security, backup and recovery, and availability solutions for improved efficiency and stronger protection.
Automate: With ever-growing volumes of PHI, security, data protection, and disaster recovery procedures should be automated to meet 24/7 patient care requirements.
Manage compliance: Verify and test trusted IT environments often to ensure compliance with HIPAA and HITECH rules and to meet recovery time objective and recovery point objective goals.
For healthcare organizations, success in this digital universe will depend on taking the right steps today to build an IT infrastructure that can manage and take advantage of the data deluge. As uncovered in The Big Data Cure, 59% of Federal executives working in agencies with a healthcare-related mission say that in five years, fulfilling their agency’s mission objectives will depend on successfully leveraging big data. But, the report also highlights that fewer than one out of five respondents say their agency is very prepared to work with big data today. So, what’s the takeaway? Consider the healthcare data that is coming as well as the target-rich data in hand. Act now to benefit long-term patient care down the road.
June 11, 2014 11:06 AM
Posted by: adelvecchio
, byod security
Guest post by Jon Jansen, CTO, Doc Halo
Though the question whether or not healthcare organizations should adopt bring your own device (BYOD) policies for physicians and staff members still crops up, there’s probably not much choice at this point.
Two years ago, 85% of hospitals were already allowing BYOD. In organizations that prohibit the practice, chances are it’s happening anyway, given the popularity of smartphones and tablets among doctors.
It’s a subject that makes healthcare executives nervous. BYOD can feel like too much of an IT security risk in an industry where data breaches hurt both the bottom line and your reputation. With the right tools, BYOD can boost healthcare efficiency without sacrificing patient privacy. Technology such as secure texting apps — including the one developed by Doc Halo — control BYOD by combining security with ease of use.
The advantages of BYOD start with physicians and other staff members, who are likely already carrying their preferred devices, with no desire to add a hospital-assigned smartphone to the mix. Healthcare organizations also stand to gain in terms of improved workflows and cost savings on devices. For health IT departments, the instinct is often to lock things down in hopes of avoiding HIPAA violations and other issues.
A key way to protect patients’ health information has been to limit which devices can access it. That approach made sense when computers stayed on desks. But now that we carry one or more of them with us everywhere we go in the form of mobile devices, it’s not as practical.
Much of the advice on BYOD in healthcare deals with rules and boundaries. The idea is to reduce the chance of problems by building layers of security, limiting what users can do from their devices and monitoring usage and access. Of course, it pays to have reasonable security. Federal rules that took effect last year mean it’s more important than ever to keep protected health information safe — or face fines of $50,000 or more per violation.
But if protocols get in the way of clinicians doing their jobs, then BYOD doesn’t accomplish anything. Users either won’t take advantage of what mobility can bring to healthcare, or they’ll find workarounds, putting your organization at even greater risk.
Healthcare needs tools, such as secure texting, that let physicians and other providers work without thinking much about security. The tools, not complicated processes or lists of dos and don’ts, should prevent protected health information (PHI) exposure. From the user’s point of view, secure texting doesn’t feel much different from regular texting, which most people do every day. However, a variety of features work together to make sure conversations stay private.
For example, a good secure texting solution encrypts PHI at all levels — database, transmission and on the app — according to federally validated standards. It also deletes messages from your app and the receiver’s app based on the time period of your choosing and has a remote wipe option in case the phone is lost. None of these security measures require time or effort from healthcare providers. The only difference that physicians are likely to notice when they start using the app is that communication is more efficient. HIPAA is here to stay, but so is BYOD. The most successful healthcare organizations are adopting tools that meet the requirements of both.
Jon Jansen is CTO and partner in Doc Halo which specializes in secure text messaging. He brings an extensive knowledge of programming secure interfaces between hospitals, EMRs and physicians’ data. He has been through the entire life-cycle of HIPAA and secure texting from its beginnings and brings the needed experience to navigate this complex topic. He formerly owned a software company which specializes in business and medical communication as well as Web-based portals for remote data access.
Jon’s role on the Doc Halo team is to coordinate all of the behind-the-scenes programming and database creation and optimization using his more than two decades of experience in this area.
May 21, 2014 4:18 PM
Posted by: adelvecchio
mobile device management
, Mobile devices
Guest post by Tracy Crowe, director of product marketing, NetMotion Wireless
For several years the Seattle-based Puget Sound Blood Center has used NetMotion Wireless’s Mobility — an enterprise mobility management product to manage mobile workforce productivity, security and control — on many of its 350 corporate laptops, while others were equipped with a different product from Citrix. After evaluating the two solutions in both mobile and office settings, the Puget Sound Blood Center (PSBC) team found that Citrix users reported regular connectivity problems while Mobility users did not. As a result, the not-for-profit decided to standardize its entire workforce on the NetMotion product. The full-scale rollout planned for 2014 includes all laptops, tablets and handheld scanners.
After comparing the two mobile workforce connectivity solutions side by side, PSBC ultimately selected NetMotion Wireless Mobility® as the software on which to standardize. The NetMotion software is now providing all of Puget Sound’s workers with a secure, reliable, and fast connection to its mission-critical Blood Establishment Computer System (BECS).
Connectivity brings time savings to live-saving effort
PSBC’s 20 mobile blood drive units are constantly canvassing the Seattle metropolitan area for life-saving blood donors. However, not all donations can be accepted. For instance, if potential donors have given blood recently, they may not be eligible to donate again so soon. Before they can accept a donation, mobile blood drive workers must access the organization’s BECS to perform a database query to determine if the donor is an approved candidate.
Having dependable, fast and seamless connectivity as they travel is a must in order to perform this process as efficiently as possible. A lost connection means having to log back in and start the process all over again — a tedious waste of work hours that often translates into time not spent collecting precious pints of blood.
“If we don’t have the connection, we can’t access that donor record information, causing delays or wasting critical time for our donors and staff,” said Tony Sheehan, network services manager at PSBC.
Testing two of the market’s most popular solutions for mobile workforces, the organization gained the confidence and motivation to standardize on the more successful product.
Standardizing was a no-brainer
NetMotion Mobility provides PSBC with a secure and reliable mobile virtual private network tunnel that ensures workers always stay linked to the BECS. Even in cellular or Wi-Fi dead zones, the solution creates a persistent connection to keep the mobile applications active rather than disconnect them. Another benefit they discovered is when laptops are closed and reopened, the connection is immediately reestablished without the user having to do anything.
The reliability and persistence of the connection provided by NetMotion stood in stark contrast to what was experienced by those PSBC workers who relied on the other product.
“There was really no contest between the two solutions,” added Sheehan. “Mobility showed it was far and away the better solution for workers that need to get and stay connected from wherever they are working.” As a result, the team decided to roll out the product to more than just the mobile workers, but also to the growing number of office staff who often bring their laptops on the road or home with them.
Sheehan attributed PSBC’s selection of NetMotion to an increasing number of complaints from employees who found it difficult to connect from home using the Citrix product. In particular, he would hear that laptops would routinely disconnect from one of the organization’s central, shared map drives.
“There’s a certain amount of bandwidth that is required to maintain a map drive over Citrix,” said Sheehan. “That was causing a huge problem because while workers have the bandwidth at the main office, they might not have that level of bandwidth at home to allow it to work. No one’s ever lost a map drive working at home using NetMotion, no matter how fast or slow the connection was.”
In addition to laptops, blood drive workers also use tablets to create donor-specific labels that are affixed to a patient’s sample and paperwork. Handheld scanners are then used to verify that these items correlate to the correct donor. Both these devices require a constant connection to the BECS and thus will be part of the new full-scale implementation.
The NetMotion Mobility software has made a difference in the usability of the organization’s handhelds and reduced the workload of IT staff. Previously, when a connection was disrupted, an oversized error message would appear on the device’s tiny screen, obscuring the instructions for how to reconnect. “Mobility has flat out stopped this type of help desk call, which could take as long as 30 minutes to resolve,” said Sheehan.
Simplicity, consistency, security
The move to standardize on NetMotion will offer several significant benefits for PSBC. First and foremost, having a single, enterprise-wide solution will simplify the task of managing and administering the company’s mobile workforce and provide users with consistency. Sheehan noted that standardization is a key component of PSBC’s 5S methodology of IT management.
Ease of use is another big plus. “Workers that previously used Citrix have found their Mobility devices are much easier to connect to the network when they’re off-site,” added Sheehan. “I use it at home all the time and find it to be so effortless. I can open up my laptop and it automatically connects to the network and I didn’t do anything.”
The solution also comes with built-in security features that allow IT or central management to selectively control which employees have access to sensitive health data. Such protections are necessary in order to ensure that the PSBC is in full compliance with the privacy policies of both HIPAA and the FDA.
In short, NetMotion’s solution has provided PSBC with a transfusion of efficiency and reliability, allowing the organization’s mobile workers to fulfill their life-saving mission uninterrupted.
May 14, 2014 1:16 PM
Posted by: adelvecchio
copy and paste
, healthcare fraud
Guest post by Charles Settles, content writer, TechnologyAdvice
No medical professional enjoys data entry. One of the most-cited frustrations with electronic medical records software is “double-charting,” or having to enter the same data in multiple places. Copying and pasting EHR data has become the solution for many physicians, albeit a dangerous one. According to a 2013 AHIMA report, as many as 90% percent of physicians use copy and paste in their EHR programs.
After a full day of patient encounters, it’s no surprise that physicians don’t look forward to hours of paperwork. While copy and paste encounter data may save time, it can lead to serious errors, and call a physician’s true intentions into question.
According to a Department of Health and Human Services report, copy and paste functionality can contribute to healthcare fraud. Healthcare fraud, according 2009 figures from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, costs taxpayers and insurers between $75 and $250 billion a year. “Upcoding,” or using increased documentation to justify billing Medicare or insurers at higher rates, can be easily done by copying and pasting previous visit information or a template of generic information to satisfy the increased documentation requirements. A few clicks can generate a pages-long note that’s not only difficult for other physicians to decipher, but for regulators as well.
Fraud may be the primary concern for the government and insurers, but even more troubling is the potential for inaccurate data to be included in a patient’s health record.
Inaccurate data could result in embarrassing yet harmless mistakes — like a male patient being scheduled for a pap smear — or it might have a much more serious and life-threatening outcome, such as an allergic reaction to a medication.
In addition to fraud and patient harm, misuse of copy and paste could result in a patient’s privacy being compromised. Imagine a situation where a physician copies information from one patient file and mistakenly pastes it into another patient file. Of course there’s potential for physical harm to the patient whose file received the inaccurate data, but the patient whose data was mistakenly copied could have information revealed about him that could allow his identity to be compromised or stolen.
Unfortunately, there are few options to combat the misuse of copying and pasting EHR data. Most viable solutions require EHR vendors to modify their software, which many companies hesitate to do. The solutions that don’t require software modification can create almost as many problems as they solve. Increased oversight by supervising physicians could help curb the misuse of copy and paste. Physicians are already required to review nurses’ input; having them read each note and correct inaccurate data instead of rubber-stamping entries would solve the problem of inaccurate data, but would lengthen the time-consuming process of data entry and review. The problem then becomes: who watches the watchers?
The most promising option would be to require programs to highlight copied and pasted information, and link it back to the original entry. Insurers and the government could then easily audit records to discover patterns of fraud due to copy and paste misuse, and supervising physicians could quickly see which physicians (or nurses) were overusing the feature. Disallowing links between separate patient records could prevent one patient’s data from being copied into another patient’s record. Whether or not this solution will come to pass is up to EMR companies and regulatory agencies.
Charles Settles is a content writer at TechnologyAdvice. He frequently covers topics related to health IT, gamification, and other emerging tech trends. Connect with Charles via Google+
May 1, 2014 11:29 AM
Posted by: adelvecchio
, mHealth applications
, Mobile applications
Guest post by: Brent Lang, president and CEO of Vocera Communications, Inc.
In a busy hospital setting, being able to reach the right person at the right time can save lives. When a clinician can instantly locate the resources and information they need, they can prevent treatment delays, reduce medical errors and spend more time on patient care.
Today’s hospital workforce needs to be more mobile and collaborative than ever before. However, due to the use of open-loop, unsecure communication technologies such as pagers that don’t integrate with a hospital’s existing clinical system, quickly communicating with the right physician or nurse is an ongoing challenge. Nurses often spend precious minutes shuffling back and forth from the central nurses’ station waiting for a response from a physician — time that could be better spent at a patient’s bedside. As a result, patients’ safety and their experience may be negatively affected.
In a fast-paced setting, where every second matters, hospital communication technology must enable busy staff to securely connect from anywhere to give approvals, answer questions and respond to emergencies. While various communication technologies already exist, hospitals should look for products that provide a suite of services in one easy-to-use application. Mobile applications must be sensitive to user communication preferences and should be accessible on any device. This allows hospital staff to communicate whether they’re inside or outside of the facility. Additionally, a mobile application that encompasses a suite of services will eliminate the uncertainty of paging, and the need to switch applications depending on the mode of communication desired.
The application should be intuitive and HIPAA-compliant, and should allow staff to reach each other instantaneously whether they are calling by name, job function, or group. For greater visibility, the application should also give users the ability to determine who is logged on and available at a moment’s notice and gain access to outside contacts, groups and distribution lists if they need to be reached in an emergency situation.
Providing hospital staff with an application that streamlines communication across the care continuum allows clinicians to make decisions in a timely manner and will dramatically increase staff collaboration. With the right mobile hospital communication technology, healthcare workers will not only increase efficiency and care quality, but also improve the patient experience, reduce unnecessary readmissions, and may help save lives.