Access your Pro+ Content below.
Meaningful use guidelines for specialists: Stickier than for primary care
This article is part of the March 2013 issue of Pulse
Meaningful use for specialists isn't as simple as it is for primary care practitioners. Read this two-part series to understand how medical professionals are tackling the challenge of complying with meaningful useguidelines. First, many specialists don't use electronic health records (EHRs) to begin with, but instead track patient data through proprietary systems as well as practice management and billing applications. Using an EHR doesn't just represent new software; it also means new, additional workflow to support meaningful use patient data reporting criteria. More news and analysis for specialists Meaningful use adoption slow among radiologists Health IT staff, radiologists need to communicate Breaking data silos between hospitals, radiologist departments Second, some specialists fear sharing data directly with patients, as required by the meaningful use program, may jeopardize business relationships with their referring physicians. They customarily deliver the news themselves to their patients, lest a test result contain ...
Features in this issue
Meaningful use for specialists can be difficult. But referring primary care physicians will demand data interoperability; avoiding it isn't an option.
Meaningful use for specialists can be difficult. But for radiologists, with some creative technology development and training, attesting is possible.
An efficient virtual server environment needs the right storage infrastructure. This article outlines the main storage considerations for a virtual server implementation.
News in this issue
High-profile politicians dominate this year's keynote sessions, but mobile health is the hot topic at HIMSS 2013.
Some health IT shops are reporting decreasing staff and even paid furloughs, but most aren't. Health IT salaries mostly aren't contracting, either.